Tuesday, July 15, 2014

And the Winner is...Laptops!

Retrieved from http://blogs.pennmanor.net/1to1/2013/08/06/about-the-pmhs-11-laptop-project/ on July 15, 2014

The following proposal is for my high school mathematics classroom. I feel the needs of a math classroom will differ greatly from a photography class or a foreign language classroom. Because of the many differences of academic goals when it comes to a 1:1 model, I have chosen not to propose a single technology for the entire school.
After researching the various available technologies, and listening the insights provided in this interview, I evaluated my teaching and learning goals before coming to a decision. The thing I value most is the ability to use the various mathematics software provided by my district (The Geometer’s Sketchpad, etc.). Although there are comparable apps for tablets or a Chromebook, their capabilities are far too limited to deem them equivalent. Therefore, I concluded that a laptop for each student is the best course. My goal was to find one that had ample storage, RAM, battery life, and other features described below.

Central Bucks East High School 1:1 Laptop Implementation for Mathematics
Introduction: Although the Central Bucks School District supports and encourages its BYOD program, there is a need for a 1:1 Initiative which provides students with the necessary mathematics software that will enhance learning and support discovery and critical thinking in the core subject area. BYOD is a useful tool for internet-based activities, but lacks the consistency of software applications and other capabilities that are unavailable on tablet and mobile phone devices.
Device and Rationale: I propose purchasing the Acer Aspire V5-571-6891, which retails for $449.99. The most appealing features are the ample screen size (15.6 inches), 500 GB storage, 6 GB RAM, and right-hand side number keyboard for math applications. Furthermore, the DVD burner will allow students to create and save large multimedia presentations. The Windows 8 operating system will support the necessary software, and is a OS that is currently supported by the district. Students are still encouraged to BYOD and can use their devices for video creation and other processes, but the collaboration and editing of projects will be conducted on and supported by the new laptops. A full review of the laptop can be found here.
Implementation and Professional Development: As in years past, teachers will have the opportunity to conduct ongoing training on the mathematics software provided by the district, as well as curriculum-based planning sessions to align the technology with curriculum goals. It is important to understand that technology alone will have no impact on students and teachers, but rather, the proper integration of technology to support learning goals. A fantastic support article on this philosophy can be found here.
The teacher will use the district IT services to aid in software installation and troubleshooting using the HelpDesk services via the school Intranet. If this proposal is accepted, I recommend a repair schedule similar to the one found here be drafted by the IT department to outline the process and possible charges for maintenance to the machines. The teacher will be responsible for maintaining a laptop cart as a charging station.
Anticipated Outcomes and Possible Problems: The use of the Internet and software such as the Geometer’s Sketchpad will enable students to interact with visual representations of mathematical concepts, manipulate data and hypothesize the effects of changing variables, and create multimedia presentations to enhance learning. Technology will provide hands-on learning that enhances the classroom experience of visual, logical, auditory, and kinesthetic learners. Students will be able to use their experience with technology when they leave the classroom and enter the working world or the college campus. Most importantly, the curriculum can be supported by creating and manipulating models of mathematical concepts that can not be created on paper or via the calculator.
Potential problems are to be expected. I chose a PC platform because it is currently supported by the district. Reliable, consistent WiFi access is imperative for the laptops initiative to succeed. Hardware and software support will be in higher demand, and may not be a financial possibility. In the beginning, I also anticipate a learning curve by the teacher (mainly in lesson planning and execution) and some students who are unfamiliar with certain software..



8 comments:

  1. Laura,
    I like your focus on consistency with the current program. You mention the need for reliable, consistent WiFi access and that is something we really had to work on when we first moved towards 1:1 last year. They had to upgrade our WiFi and our servers to handle the greater demand. There are still some "cold spots" in the school (one particular area is the ISS room!) but most were taken care of during the year.
    Have you found that integrating technology into your classroom to be in any way more time consuming? For me, that was a huge positive to 1:1 over having a laptop cart in my class. When each student has his/her own device, they open it up and are ready to go--no 3 minutes at the beginning and 3 minutes at the end of class every day to power up and shut down/put away.
    Your blog is thorough and interesting. Thanks for sharing.
    Kelly P.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kelly - yes, I definitely noticed how time consuming it can be to set up and clean up technology components as I begin to integrate. Sometimes, the activity gets away from me and I end up being the one to shut down and fix the cart when the bell rings. Having meaningful conversation and closure would be a far better use of those final minutes!

      Delete
  2. Laura,
    I am going to repeat what Kelly said, your blog is very thorough and hits a lot of key points that I hadn't thought of. I really appreciated seeing the link about repair costs. That district is certainly protecting themselves, the equipment they are providing and I believe it will ensure that students/parents make sure that their piece is taken care of properly with few issues. Instead of just putting out a set fee, they have gone the extra step to make sure that most problems that could occur are covered.
    Thanks for sharing!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ashley - thanks for noticing the cost schedule. It was something I didn't see in many policies, and I thought it would be an important cost-saving component.

      Delete
  3. Hi, Laura!
    I agree with your reasoning behind choosing laptops vs BYOD. When utilizing certain programs and software, many devices brought from home are not compatible. This causes so much chaos and time consuming trouble shooting. The only question I have for your proposal is how it will be funded. Great research.
    -Kirsta

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kirsta - my district has done a lot of technology integration through CFF (classrooms for the future) grants. Perhaps this would be something that could expand into 1:1.
      I totally agree that BYOD in its current state is just not working for the reasons you listed. I don't know if there is a good fix for these issues or not. Kinda frustrating.

      Delete
  4. Laura,

    I really liked that you didn't get blinded by the shine of the hot devices and sought what was best for your classroom and students. I also thought it was smart to discuss aligning the use of technology into the current curriculum. Having a clear and concise plan for implementation will help things run much more smoothly. This also helps everyone work towards implementation across the math department. It is also great that you included a strong battery life as a requirement because I've gone through the unfortunate loss of battery life during a class activity.

    Codie

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks, Codie. As I work through these classes, I am finding my mindset is expanding to think about things like battery life and other factors that make implementation run smoothly rather than only worrying about the hardware. Little things like that can make or break a lesson.

    ReplyDelete