![]()  | 
| Retrieved from http://blogs.pennmanor.net/1to1/2013/08/06/about-the-pmhs-11-laptop-project/ on July 15, 2014 | 
The following
proposal is for my high school mathematics classroom. I feel the needs of a
math classroom will differ greatly from a photography class or a foreign
language classroom. Because of the many differences of academic goals when it
comes to a 1:1 model, I have chosen not to propose a single technology for the
entire school.
After
researching the various available technologies, and listening the insights
provided in this interview, I evaluated my teaching and learning goals before coming
to a decision. The thing I value most is the ability to use the various
mathematics software provided by my district (The Geometer’s Sketchpad, etc.).
Although there are comparable apps for tablets or a Chromebook, their
capabilities are far too limited to deem them equivalent. Therefore, I
concluded that a laptop for each student is the best course. My goal was to
find one that had ample storage, RAM, battery life, and other features
described below.
Central Bucks
East High School 1:1 Laptop Implementation for Mathematics
Introduction: Although the
Central Bucks School District supports and encourages its BYOD program, there
is a need for a 1:1 Initiative which provides students with the necessary
mathematics software that will enhance learning and support discovery and
critical thinking in the core subject area. BYOD is a useful tool for
internet-based activities, but lacks the consistency of software applications
and other capabilities that are unavailable on tablet and mobile phone devices.
Device and Rationale: I propose
purchasing the Acer Aspire V5-571-6891, which retails
for $449.99. The most appealing features are the ample screen size (15.6
inches), 500 GB storage, 6 GB RAM, and right-hand side number keyboard for math
applications. Furthermore, the DVD burner will allow students to create and
save large multimedia presentations. The Windows 8 operating system will
support the necessary software, and is a OS that is currently supported by the
district. Students are still encouraged to BYOD and can use their devices for
video creation and other processes, but the collaboration and editing of
projects will be conducted on and supported by the new laptops. A full review
of the laptop can be found here.
Implementation and Professional
Development: As in years past, teachers will have the opportunity to conduct ongoing
training on the mathematics software provided by the district, as well as
curriculum-based planning sessions to align the technology with curriculum
goals. It is important to understand that technology alone will have no impact
on students and teachers, but rather, the proper integration of technology to
support learning goals. A fantastic support article on this philosophy can be
found here.
The teacher will
use the district IT services to aid in software installation and
troubleshooting using the HelpDesk services via the school Intranet. If this
proposal is accepted, I recommend a repair schedule similar to the one found here be drafted by the IT department to outline the process and possible charges
for maintenance to the machines. The teacher will be responsible for
maintaining a laptop cart as a charging station. 
Anticipated Outcomes and Possible
Problems: The use of the Internet and software such as the Geometer’s Sketchpad
will enable students to interact with visual representations of mathematical
concepts, manipulate data and hypothesize the effects of changing variables,
and create multimedia presentations to enhance learning. Technology will
provide hands-on learning that enhances the classroom experience of visual,
logical, auditory, and kinesthetic learners. Students will be able to use their
experience with technology when they leave the classroom and enter the working
world or the college campus. Most importantly, the curriculum can be supported
by creating and manipulating models of mathematical concepts that can not be created
on paper or via the calculator. 
Potential
problems are to be expected. I chose a PC platform because it is currently
supported by the district. Reliable, consistent WiFi access is imperative for
the laptops initiative to succeed. Hardware and software support will be in
higher demand, and may not be a financial possibility. In the beginning, I also
anticipate a learning curve by the teacher (mainly in lesson planning and execution)
and some students who are unfamiliar with certain software.. 

Laura,
ReplyDeleteI like your focus on consistency with the current program. You mention the need for reliable, consistent WiFi access and that is something we really had to work on when we first moved towards 1:1 last year. They had to upgrade our WiFi and our servers to handle the greater demand. There are still some "cold spots" in the school (one particular area is the ISS room!) but most were taken care of during the year.
Have you found that integrating technology into your classroom to be in any way more time consuming? For me, that was a huge positive to 1:1 over having a laptop cart in my class. When each student has his/her own device, they open it up and are ready to go--no 3 minutes at the beginning and 3 minutes at the end of class every day to power up and shut down/put away.
Your blog is thorough and interesting. Thanks for sharing.
Kelly P.
Kelly - yes, I definitely noticed how time consuming it can be to set up and clean up technology components as I begin to integrate. Sometimes, the activity gets away from me and I end up being the one to shut down and fix the cart when the bell rings. Having meaningful conversation and closure would be a far better use of those final minutes!
DeleteLaura,
ReplyDeleteI am going to repeat what Kelly said, your blog is very thorough and hits a lot of key points that I hadn't thought of. I really appreciated seeing the link about repair costs. That district is certainly protecting themselves, the equipment they are providing and I believe it will ensure that students/parents make sure that their piece is taken care of properly with few issues. Instead of just putting out a set fee, they have gone the extra step to make sure that most problems that could occur are covered.
Thanks for sharing!
Ashley - thanks for noticing the cost schedule. It was something I didn't see in many policies, and I thought it would be an important cost-saving component.
DeleteHi, Laura!
ReplyDeleteI agree with your reasoning behind choosing laptops vs BYOD. When utilizing certain programs and software, many devices brought from home are not compatible. This causes so much chaos and time consuming trouble shooting. The only question I have for your proposal is how it will be funded. Great research.
-Kirsta
Kirsta - my district has done a lot of technology integration through CFF (classrooms for the future) grants. Perhaps this would be something that could expand into 1:1.
DeleteI totally agree that BYOD in its current state is just not working for the reasons you listed. I don't know if there is a good fix for these issues or not. Kinda frustrating.
Laura,
ReplyDeleteI really liked that you didn't get blinded by the shine of the hot devices and sought what was best for your classroom and students. I also thought it was smart to discuss aligning the use of technology into the current curriculum. Having a clear and concise plan for implementation will help things run much more smoothly. This also helps everyone work towards implementation across the math department. It is also great that you included a strong battery life as a requirement because I've gone through the unfortunate loss of battery life during a class activity.
Codie
Thanks, Codie. As I work through these classes, I am finding my mindset is expanding to think about things like battery life and other factors that make implementation run smoothly rather than only worrying about the hardware. Little things like that can make or break a lesson.
ReplyDelete